Is self-injectable epinephrine being used by children with food allergy?

No disponible

Clinical and immunological profile of children aged 5-9 years with persistent egg allergy before oral immunotherapy with egg. A multicenter, randomized controlled trial of the Spanish Society of Pediatric Allergy, Asthma and Clinical Immunology (SEICAP)

BACKGROUND: In children with egg protein allergy (EA), the probability of overcoming the allergy decreases with age, and the possibility of suffering severe adverse reactions as a consequence of dietetic transgressions results in worsened quality of life. One treatment option in such cases is oral immunotherapy (OIT) with foods. METHODS: We present a cohort of children with EA scheduled for OIT with pasteurized raw egg white, describing their clinical and allergic characteristics before the start of OIT. RESULTS: The median age was six years, and 93% of the patients also suffered other allergies (58% asthma and 38.6% allergy to more than two food groups). In the last year, 14.8% had suffered a severe reaction due to dietetic transgression with egg. The median IgE specific of egg white titer was 38.5 kU/l. A double-blind placebo-controlled food challenge with cooked egg white was performed, and if the test proved positive, it was repeated with pasteurized raw egg white. The mean symptoms-provoking dose was 1.26 g and 0.55 g for cooked egg white and raw egg white, respectively. An IgE specific of ovomucoid titer of <2.045 kU/l differentiated those patients that tolerated cooked egg white. CONCLUSIONS: OIT with egg is regarded as an option in patients with persistent egg allergy. In the previous challenge test, an IgE specific of ovomucoid titer of <2.045 kU/l differentiates those patients that tolerate cooked egg white

No disponible

Clinical and immunological profile of children aged 5-9 years with persistent egg allergy before oral immunotherapy with egg. A multicenter, randomized controlled trial of the Spanish Society of Pediatric Allergy, Asthma and Clinical Immunology (SEICAP).

BACKGROUND: In children with egg protein allergy (EA), the probability of overcoming the allergy decreases with age, and the possibility of suffering severe adverse reactions as a consequence of dietetic transgressions results in worsened quality of life. One treatment option in such cases is oral immunotherapy (OIT) with foods. METHODS: We present a cohort of children with EA scheduled for OIT with pasteurized raw egg white, describing their clinical and allergic characteristics before the start of OIT. RESULTS: The median age was six years, and 93% of the patients also suffered other allergies (58% asthma and 38.6% allergy to more than two food groups). In the last year, 14.8% had suffered a severe reaction due to dietetic transgression with egg. The median IgE specific of egg white titer was 38.5kU/l. A double-blind placebo-controlled food challenge with cooked egg white was performed, and if the test proved positive, it was repeated with pasteurized raw egg white. The mean symptoms-provoking dose was 1.26g and 0.55g for cooked egg white and raw egg white, respectively. An IgE specific of ovomucoid titer of <2.045kU/l differentiated those patients that tolerated cooked egg white. CONCLUSIONS: OIT with egg is regarded as an option in patients with persistent egg allergy. In the previous challenge test, an IgE specific of ovomucoid titer of <2.045kU/l differentiates those patients that tolerate cooked egg white.

Social Media as a Tool for the Management of Food Allergy in Children.

BACKGROUND: Food allergy markedly impairs quality of life, and avoiding the offending food requires extensive patient education. Social media have been proven a useful source of information for other chronic conditions. Our aim was to describe how pediatric patients with food allergy and their families are using social media. METHODS: We performed a cross-sectional study in the pediatric allergy unit of a tertiary hospital. Patients with food allergy were questioned about their disease and their use of social media. The survey was completed by the patients themselves in the case of those aged over 13 years and by parents or guardians in the case of younger patients. RESULTS: We included 193 patients (162 guardians, 31 adolescents). Social media were used by 109 guardians (67.3%) and 29 adolescents (90.3%), of whom 30.3% and 6.9%, respectively, used them for food allergy-related purposes. The most popular websites were Facebook for guardians (52.2%) and YouTube for teenagers (80.6%). Having cow's milk and/or egg allergy was the only feature related to using social media for food allergy. Using social media for information on food allergy did not correlate with the frequency of recent reactions, self-scored knowledge about food allergy, or opinion on evidence-based or alternative therapies for the disease. CONCLUSIONS: Most patients and guardians of patients with food allergy used social media. However, only a small portion accessed used them to increase their knowledge of the disease.

Food protein-induced enterocolitis syndrome by fish: Not necessarily a restricted diet.

Food protein-induced enterocolitis syndrome (FPIES) is a non-IgE-mediated gastrointestinal food hypersensitivity usually due to cow's milk or soy. Recent researches show that fish is 1 of the most important triggers of FPIES in the Mediterranean countries. Due to the risk of multiple-food FPIES, avoiding foods in the same category or that often occur together may be reasonable. The aim of this study was to evaluate the evolution and follow-up of FPIES related to fish over a period of 20 years. We describe the clinical features of our population, discuss different approaches to oral food challenges, and analyze the possibility of introducing the culprit fish or other nonrelated fish to avoid unnecessary restricted diets.

Social media as a tool for the management of food allergy in children

Background: Food allergy markedly impairs quality of life, and avoiding the offending food requires extensive patient education. Social media have been proven a useful source of information for other chronic conditions. Our aim was to describe how pediatric patients with food allergy and their families are using social media. Methods: We performed a cross-sectional study in the pediatric allergy unit of a tertiary hospital. Patients with food allergy were questioned about their disease and their use of social media. The survey was completed by the patients themselves in the case of those aged over 13 years and by parents or guardians in the case of younger patients. Results: We included 193 patients (162 guardians, 31 adolescents). Social media were used by 109 guardians (67.3%) and 29 adolescents (90.3%), of whom 30.3% and 6.9%, respectively, used them for food allergy-related purposes. The most popular websites were Facebook for guardians (52.2%) and YouTube for teenagers (80.6%). Having cow's milk and/or egg allergy was the only feature related to using social media for food allergy. Using social media for information on food allergy did not correlate with the frequency of recent reactions, self-scored knowledge about food allergy, or opinion on evidence-based or alternative therapies for the disease. Conclusions: Most patients and guardians of patients with food allergy used social media. However, only a small portion accessed used them to increase their knowledge of the disease

Introducción: La alergia alimentaria afecta a la calidad de vida de quienes la sufren. La evitación de los alimentos que la producen exige la educación de los pacientes. Las redes sociales han demostrado ser una fuente útil de información acerca de otras enfermedades crónicas. El objetivo de este estudio fue describir el uso de las redes sociales por parte de los pacientes en edad pediátrica con alergia alimentaria, así como el de sus familias. Métodos: Se realizó un estudio transversal en la Unidad de Alergia Infantil de un hospital de tercer nivel. Se encuestó a pacientes diagnosticados de alergia alimentaria, acerca de su enfermedad, así como de su uso de las redes sociales. La encuesta fue cumplimentada por los propios pacientes a partir de los 13 años de edad, mientras que los tutores lo hicieron en los casos de pacientes menores. Resultados: Se incluyeron 193 pacientes (162 tutores y 31 adolescentes). Las redes sociales eran utilizadas por 109 tutores (67,3%) y 29 adolescentes (90,3%), de los que el 30,3% y el 6,9%, respectivamente, lo hacían en relación con la alergia alimentaria. Las páginas web más frecuentes eran Facebook(TM) en el caso de los tutores (52,2%) y YouTube(TM) entre los adolescentes (80,6%). Ser alérgico a la leche y/o al huevo era la única característica que se relacionó con el uso de redes sociales en relación a la alergia alimentaria. El uso de las redes sociales para informarse acerca de la alergia a los alimentos no se correlacionó con la frecuencia de reacciones, la percepción del conocimiento propio acerca de la alergia alimentaria o la opinión sobre terapias científicas y alternativas para su enfermedad. Conclusiones: La mayoría de los pacientes con alergia alimentaria y sus tutores son usuarios de las redes sociales. Sin embargo, sólo una pequeña porción las utiliza para formarse acerca de su enfermedad

Consenso para el abordaje del asma grave pediátrica en la práctica clínica habitual / Consensus-based approach for severe paediatric asthma in routine clinical practice

INTRODUCCIÓN: La identificación adecuada del paciente pediátrico con asma grave es esencial para su correcto manejo. Sin embargo, los criterios para definir el asma grave y las recomendaciones para su control varían mucho entre las distintas guías. MATERIAL Y MÉTODOS: Se elaboró una encuesta telemática para analizar las opiniones relativas a la definición y control del asma grave pediátrica. Para lograr un consenso se siguió una metodología Delphi modificada. Con los resultados se elaboraron recomendaciones prácticas. RESULTADOS: El cuestionario fue respondido por 11 neumólogos y alergólogos pediátricos expertos en asma grave. Hubo consenso en 50 de los 65 ítems planteados (76,92%). Se consideró que un paciente tiene asma grave si en el último año ha requerido 2 o más ciclos de corticoides orales, si requiere tratamiento diario con corticoides inhalados a dosis medias (con otra medicación controladora) o dosis altas (con o sin otra medicación controladora), si no responde a un tratamiento convencional optimizado, o si la enfermedad pone en riesgo su vida o deteriora gravemente su calidad de vida. La definición de asma grave también podría incluir a los pacientes que consumen recursos sanitarios de manera regular y justificada, o tienen factores psicosociales o ambientales que impiden su control. Para la monitorización, se recomienda usar cuestionarios específicos de población pediátrica (CAN o ACT). Respecto al tratamiento, se debería considerar el uso de omalizumab en un escalón anterior al de los corticoides orales. CONCLUSIONES: El presente trabajo ofrece recomendaciones consensuadas que pueden ser de utilidad en el manejo del asma grave pediátrica

INTRODUCTION: Accurate identification of paediatric patients with severe asthma is essential for an adequate management of the disease. However, criteria for defining severe asthma and recommendations for control vary among different guidelines. MATERIAL AND METHODS: An online survey was conducted to explore expert opinions about the definition and management of severe paediatric asthma. To reach a consensus agreement, a modified Delphi technique was used, and practice guidelines were prepared after the analysis of the results. RESULTS: Eleven paediatric chest disease physicians and allergy specialists with wide expertise in severe asthma responded to the survey. Consensus was reached in 50 out of 65 questions (76.92%). It was considered that a patient has severe asthma if during the previous year they have required 2 or more cycles of oral steroids, required daily treatment with medium doses of inhaled corticosteroids (with other controller medication) or high doses (with or without other controller medication), did not respond to optimised conventional treatment, or if the disease threatened the life of the patient or seriously impairs their quality of life. The definition of severe asthma may also include patients who justifiably use health resources on a regular basis, or have psychosocial or environmental factors impeding control. For monitoring, the use of questionnaires designed specifically for paediatric population, such as CAN or ACT, is recommended. As regards treatment, the use of omalizumab should be considered prior to the use of oral corticosteroids. CONCLUSIONS: This paper provides consensus recommendations that may be useful in the management of severe paediatric asthma

[Consensus-based approach for severe paediatric asthma in routine clinical practice]. / Consenso para el abordaje del asma grave pediátrica en la práctica clínica habitual.

INTRODUCTION: Accurate identification of paediatric patients with severe asthma is essential for an adequate management of the disease. However, criteria for defining severe asthma and recommendations for control vary among different guidelines. MATERIAL AND METHODS: An online survey was conducted to explore expert opinions about the definition and management of severe paediatric asthma. To reach a consensus agreement, a modified Delphi technique was used, and practice guidelines were prepared after the analysis of the results. RESULTS: Eleven paediatric chest disease physicians and allergy specialists with wide expertise in severe asthma responded to the survey. Consensus was reached in 50 out of 65 questions (76.92%). It was considered that a patient has severe asthma if during the previous year they have required 2 or more cycles of oral steroids, required daily treatment with medium doses of inhaled corticosteroids (with other controller medication) or high doses (with or without other controller medication), did not respond to optimised conventional treatment, or if the disease threatened the life of the patient or seriously impairs their quality of life. The definition of severe asthma may also include patients who justifiably use health resources on a regular basis, or have psychosocial or environmental factors impeding control. For monitoring, the use of questionnaires designed specifically for paediatric population, such as CAN or ACT, is recommended. As regards treatment, the use of omalizumab should be considered prior to the use of oral corticosteroids. CONCLUSIONS: This paper provides consensus recommendations that may be useful in the management of severe paediatric asthma.

Tolerance to cephalosporins in nonimmediate hypersensitivity to penicillins in pediatric patients

No disponible

Skin test-positive immediate hypersensitivity reaction to iodinated contrast media: the role of controlled challenge testing.

BACKGROUND: Immediate hypersensitivity reactions (IHR) to iodinated contrast media (ICM) have traditionally been considered nonallergic; however, the increasingly frequent reporting of positive skin test and basophil activation test results suggests a specific allergic mechanism in some patients. Skin tests have been proposed as a useful tool for diagnosis, although their sensitivity and predictive values remain to be determined. The role of controlled challenge testing has not been assessed. OBJECTIVE: We aimed to evaluate the role of controlled challenge testing in skin test-positive IHR to ICM. PATIENTS AND METHODS: We evaluated 106 patients with IHR to ICM by performing skin tests with the agent that caused the reaction. Patients with a positive result were selected. Skin tests were extended to a series of 8 ICMs; 5 patients underwent controlled challenge test with an alternative skin test-negative ICM; a further 2 patients underwent computed tomography with an alternative skin test-negative ICM. No premedication was administered. RESULTS: Intradermal test results were positive to the ICM that caused the reaction in 11 out of 106 patients (10.4%). Five of the 11 patients tolerated a controlled challenge test with an alternative skin test-negative ICM. The 2 patients who underwent computed tomography with an alternative skin test-negative ICM tolerated the medium. CONCLUSIONS: Skin tests are useful for the diagnostic workup in patients with an allergic IHR to ICM. Since ICM cannot be avoided in many patients because they are irreplaceable in some diagnostic or therapeutic techniques, an alternative safe ICM should be investigated for future procedures. We propose the use of controlled challenge tests based on skin test results to address this need in skin test-positive reactions in order to identify an alternative non-cross-reactive ICM.

Specific oral tolerance induction in paediatric patients with persistent egg allergy

Introduction: Desensitisation or specific oral tolerance induction (SOTI) to food is a new topical-therapeutic approach of food allergy for those children who have not achieved tolerance spontaneously. The objective of this study is to induce clinical tolerance in children with persistent allergy using an oral desensitisation protocol with powdered pasteurised egg. Methods: Seventy-two patients with egg allergy confirmed by open oral challenge test were randomly assigned to SOTI or elimination diet as a control group. Forty children (5–15 years) underwent a SOTI beginning with 1mg and increasing the dosage weekly until a dose of 10g, equivalent to an egg. The control group included 32 patients (4–15 years). Results: The procedure's average duration was 10 weeks (range 4–28 weeks). Three patients were withdrawn from the protocol for persistent gastrointestinal symptoms. During SOTI, 21 children (52.5%) presented symptoms. In eight the symptoms were mild and required no treatment. In the other 13 (61.90%), the reactions were more severe. Seventeen children finished the treatment over a year ago and 20 in the past 6–12 months. Thirty-seven patients (92.5%) in the active group achieved tolerance to egg, versus 21.8% in the control group. We only found statistically significant differences (p<0.05) for skin prick tests with powdered egg at various dilutions and IgG levels with egg white after SOTI. Specific IgE concentration did not change significantly. Conclusions: Our SOTI protocol is a safe, effective treatment for food allergy and of reasonable duration, confirming that tolerance can be induced in children who have not achieved it spontaneously (AU)

Skin Test–Positive Immediate Hypersensitivity Reaction to Iodinated Contrast Media: The Role of Controlled Challenge Testing

Antecedentes: Aunque clásicamente las reacciones de hipersensibilidad inmediatas (RHI) a medios de contraste iodados (MCI) se han considerado no alérgicas, la publicación creciente de pruebas cutáneas y test de activación de basófilos positivos, sugieren un mecanismo alérgico específico en algunos pacientes. Se han propuesto las pruebas cutáneas como una herramienta útil para el diagnóstico, aunque su sensibilidad y valores predictivos están aún por conocer. El papel de la prueba de provocación controlada no se ha determinado. Objetivo: El objetivo fue evaluar el papel de la prueba de provocación controlada en las RHI a MCI con prueba cutánea positiva. Pacientes y Métodos: Evaluamos 106 pacientes con RHI a MCI mediante prueba cutánea con el contraste que causó la reacción. Se seleccionaron los pacientes con resultado positivo: se ampliaron las pruebas cutáneas con una serie de 8 MCI; en 5 pacientes se realizó prueba de provocación controlada con un MCI alternativo con resultado negativo en la prueba cutánea; otros dos pacientes se sometieron a una tomografía computarizada con un MCI alternativo con resultado negativo en la prueba cutánea. No se administró ninguna premedicación. Resultados: Las pruebas intradérmicas fueron positivas al MCI que causó la reacción en 11 de 106 pacientes (10.4%). Cinco de ellos toleraron la prueba de provocación controlada con un MCI alternativo con resultado negativo en la prueba cutánea. Los otros 2 pacientes a los que se les realizó una tomografía computarizada con un MCI alternativo con prueba cutánea negativa, también lo toleraron. Conclusiones: Las pruebas cutáneas son útiles para la valoración diagnóstica en las RHI alérgicas a MCI. Dado que en muchos pacientes los MCI no pueden ser evitados al ser irremplazables para algunas técnicas diagnósticas o terapéuticas, es necesario identificar un MCI alternativo para ser utilizado con seguridad en procedimientos futuros. Proponemos el uso de la prueba de provocación controlada basada en los resultados de las pruebas cutáneas para resolver esta situación en estas reacciones con prueba cutánea positiva, para poder identificar un MCI alternativo sin reactividad cruzada (AU)

Background: Immediate hypersensitivity reactions (IHR) to iodinated contrast media (ICM) have traditionally been considered nonallergic; however, the increasingly frequent reporting of positive skin test and basophil activation test results suggests a specific allergic mechanism in some patients. Skin tests have been proposed as a useful tool for diagnosis, although their sensitivity and predictive values remain to be determined. The role of controlled challenge testing has not been assessed. Objective: We aimed to evaluate the role of controlled challenge testing in skin test–positive IHR to ICM. Patients and Methods: We evaluated 106 patients with IHR to ICM by performing skin tests with the agent that caused the reaction. Patients with a positive result were selected. Skin tests were extended to a series of 8 ICMs; 5 patients underwent controlled challenge test with an alternative skin test–negative ICM; a further 2 patients underwent computed tomography with an alternative skin test–negative ICM. No premedication was administered. Results: Intradermal test results were positive to the ICM that caused the reaction in 11 out of 106 patients (10.4%). Five of the 11 patients tolerated a controlled challenge test with an alternative skin test–negative ICM. The 2 patients who underwent computed tomography with an alternative skin test–negative ICM tolerated the medium. Conclusions: Skin tests are useful for the diagnostic workup in patients with an allergic IHR to ICM. Since ICM cannot be avoided in many patients because they are irreplaceable in some diagnostic or therapeutic techniques, an alternative safe ICM should be investigated for future procedures. We propose the use of controlled challenge tests based on skin test results to address this need in skin test–positive reactions in order to identify an alternative non–cross-reactive ICM (AU)

Specific oral tolerance induction in paediatric patients with persistent egg allergy.

INTRODUCTION: Desensitisation or specific oral tolerance induction (SOTI) to food is a new topical-therapeutic approach of food allergy for those children who have not achieved tolerance spontaneously. The objective of this study is to induce clinical tolerance in children with persistent allergy using an oral desensitisation protocol with powdered pasteurised egg. METHODS: Seventy-two patients with egg allergy confirmed by open oral challenge test were randomly assigned to SOTI or elimination diet as a control group. Forty children (5-15 years) underwent a SOTI beginning with 1mg and increasing the dosage weekly until a dose of 10g, equivalent to an egg. The control group included 32 patients (4-15 years). RESULTS: The procedure's average duration was 10 weeks (range 4-28 weeks). Three patients were withdrawn from the protocol for persistent gastrointestinal symptoms. During SOTI, 21 children (52.5%) presented symptoms. In eight the symptoms were mild and required no treatment. In the other 13 (61.90%), the reactions were more severe. Seventeen children finished the treatment over a year ago and 20 in the past 6-12 months. Thirty-seven patients (92.5%) in the active group achieved tolerance to egg, versus 21.8% in the control group. We only found statistically significant differences (p<0.05) for skin prick tests with powdered egg at various dilutions and IgG levels with egg white after SOTI. Specific IgE concentration did not change significantly. CONCLUSIONS: Our SOTI protocol is a safe, effective treatment for food allergy and of reasonable duration, confirming that tolerance can be induced in children who have not achieved it spontaneously.

Oral desensitization as a useful treatment in 2-year-old children with cow's milk allergy.

BACKGROUND: Limited published evidence shows oral desensitization to be a potential intervention option for cow's milk protein (CMPs) allergy. OBJECTIVE: The aim of this study was to evaluate the safety and efficacy of oral desensitization in 2-year-old children with cow's milk allergy, as a treatment alternative to elimination diet. METHODS: A total of 60 children aged 24-36 months with IgE-mediated allergy to CMPs were included in this multi-center study and were randomized into two groups. Thirty children (group A: treatment group) began oral desensitization immediately, whereas the remaining 30 (group B: control group) were kept on a milk-free diet and followed-up for 1 year. RESULTS: After 1-year follow-up period, 90% of the children in group A had become completely tolerant vs. 23% of the children in group B. In group A, cow's milk skin reactivity and serum-specific IgE to milk and casein decreased significantly from the initial assessment, whereas group B showed no significant change after 1 year of follow-up. Twenty-four patients (80%) developed some reaction during the treatment period: 14 children developed moderate reaction (47%) and 10 mild reaction (33%). The most common manifestations were urticaria-angioedema, followed by cough. CONCLUSIONS AND CLINICAL RELEVANCE: In this study, oral desensitization was found to be effective in a significant percentage of 2-year-old children with cow's milk allergy. Oral desensitization appears to be efficacious as an alternative to elimination diet in the treatment of 2-year-old children with cow's milk allergy. The side-effect profile appears acceptable but requires further study.

Clinical evolution of patients with respiratory allergic disease due to sensitisation to Alternaria alternata being treated with subcutaneous immunotherapy

Introduction: Sensitisation to Alternaria is a cause of respiratory disease in Spain, particularly in childhood, but it is also a significant marker of the severity of this disease. Therefore, the use of an aetiological treatment (allergen specific immunotherapy) is essential, and both subjective and objective clinical parameters should be used to follow up this treatment. Objective: This open-label, uncontrolled, observational, prospective study was designed inorder to study the evolution of these patients on allergen specific immunotherapy therapy in daily clinical practice and to assess the use of different monitoring tools. Material and Methods: A total of 99 patients were included. They were monosensitised to this perennial allergen and treated with subcutaneous allergen specific immunotherapy. Afterone year of follow-up, these patients were assessed for the presence of symptoms, use of medication, clinical incidents, quality of life and asthma control. Results: After one year of treatment a significant fall was observed in the use of concomitant medication ( 2-agonists: p = 0.0278, inhaled corticosteroids: p = 0.0007, anti-leukotrienes:p = 0.0495), nasal symptoms (p = 0.0081), quality of life (PAQLQ, p < 0.0001) and asthma control (ACQ, p < 0.0001). Twenty-one patients had to attend emergency department due to exacerbation of their allergic disease, and only one of them had to be admitted to hospital. Conclusion: respiratory allergic disease due to Alternaria alternata is a disease which is hard to control, and in our daily practice, the use of specific subcutaneous immunotherapy can be of significant benefit in our paediatric patients (AU)